HoRAE TODO - Revision history

Mentaer at 22:57, 16 March 2012

2012-03-16T22:57:56Z

Mentaer at 22:37, 16 March 2012

2012-03-16T22:37:12Z

Mentaer at 18:09, 16 March 2012

2012-03-16T18:09:32Z

Mentaer: Created page with 'list of possible extensions/research: * test if h_MTD can be a good recommendation in general, i.e. test with non-grizzly datasets * look into inference from individual to group…'

2012-03-16T17:12:28Z

Created page with 'list of possible extensions/research: * test if h_MTD can be a good recommendation in general, i.e. test with non-grizzly datasets * look into inference from individual to group…'

New page

list of possible extensions/research:
* test if h_MTD can be a good recommendation in general, i.e. test with non-grizzly datasets
* look into inference from individual to groups and populations (see Otis and White 1999)
* look into analysis tools that consider 2 individuals, i.e. to evaluate their temporary relationships (e.g. distances)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:57, 16 March 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	return to [[Movement Analysis]]
		+	----
		+
	list of possible extensions/research:		list of possible extensions/research:
	* test if h_MTD can be a good recommendation in general, i.e. test with non-grizzly datasets		* test if h_MTD can be a good recommendation in general, i.e. test with non-grizzly datasets

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:37, 16 March 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:
	* look into analysis tools that consider 2 individuals, i.e. to evaluate their temporary relationships (e.g. distances)		* look into analysis tools that consider 2 individuals, i.e. to evaluate their temporary relationships (e.g. distances)
	* investigate if it makes sense to remove points/HR parts based on distance to "activity centers" (assumes convex HR).. this was suggested for buffer approach by one of the reviewers (and derives from the modified MCP).		* investigate if it makes sense to remove points/HR parts based on distance to "activity centers" (assumes convex HR).. this was suggested for buffer approach by one of the reviewers (and derives from the modified MCP).
		+	* extend Asymptote tool with sub-sampling and resulting sample set evaluations on HR estimation.
		+	* home range classification: core area vs. edge: the edge with in Voigt et al (2007) is fairly static, whereas the edge width from calculations after Harris et al. (1990) and Seaman and Powell (1990) does vary quite a bit.
		+	* can we add noise to make LSCV more robust/working?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:09, 16 March 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	* look into inference from individual to groups and populations (see Otis and White 1999)		* look into inference from individual to groups and populations (see Otis and White 1999)
	* look into analysis tools that consider 2 individuals, i.e. to evaluate their temporary relationships (e.g. distances)		* look into analysis tools that consider 2 individuals, i.e. to evaluate their temporary relationships (e.g. distances)
		+	* investigate if it makes sense to remove points/HR parts based on distance to "activity centers" (assumes convex HR).. this was suggested for buffer approach by one of the reviewers (and derives from the modified MCP).